Top Trump Aide Katie Miller Allegedly Pressured Social Security to Falsely Confirm Elon Musk Fraud Claims, Report Reveals

In a startling investigative report published by The New York Times on Monday, Katie Miller — a high-ranking aide during the Trump administration and wife of former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller — is accused of ordering Social Security Administration (SSA) officials to falsely affirm a fraudulent claim made by tech billionaire Elon Musk.

According to the report, Miller personally contacted Leland Dudek, the acting Social Security Administrator, on April 1st and instructed him to publicly endorse Musk’s assertion that 40 percent of calls to the agency’s service lines were scams. Miller allegedly warned Dudek, “Do not contradict the president.”

The Origins of the Controversy

Musk’s controversial statement was made during a rally in March, igniting immediate questions about its accuracy. Sources reveal that Musk’s fixation on Social Security fraud began as part of his efforts overseeing DOGE, a government agency focused on digital operations.

The Times uncovered that Musk’s team had misinterpreted government spending data, leading them to believe that fraud was occurring on a massive scale. In response, Musk’s staff mobilized dozens of SSA employees to support the narrative of widespread fraud.

Pressure on Social Security Administration Employees

Internal memos and testimonies from over 70 current and former SSA employees reveal a troubling effort to align the agency’s official stance with Musk’s claims. The project also involved scrutinizing deceased beneficiaries to ensure they were properly classified to avoid erroneous payments, despite internal acknowledgment that payments to deceased individuals were not happening.

Sources disclosed that the SSA, which has faced significant staffing cuts due to DOGE-led budget reductions, experienced further strain as a result of these efforts. Nearly 12 percent of SSA’s 57,000 employees have departed or are expected to leave soon, compounding the agency’s challenges.

Political and Ethical Implications

The revelation raises serious ethical questions about political interference in federal agencies and the manipulation of public information to support unsubstantiated claims. The alleged directive from Miller to “not contradict the president” underscores a troubling dynamic between political loyalty and factual integrity.

Katie Miller, who departed the White House alongside Musk in May to pursue private business ventures, did not respond to requests for comment from The New York Times. Musk also declined to comment.

Broader Context and Reactions

The report adds to ongoing scrutiny of political influence on federal agencies and the use of misinformation in public discourse. Critics argue that such interference undermines public trust and jeopardizes the efficacy of government institutions.

Experts warn that pressuring agency employees to propagate misleading statistics could have long-lasting consequences, from misinformed policy decisions to a decline in public confidence in critical social programs.

Looking Ahead

As the story unfolds, congressional leaders and watchdog groups are expected to demand further investigations into the alleged misconduct. The Social Security Administration’s ability to operate independently and transparently remains under the spotlight.

This exposé serves as a potent reminder of the delicate balance between political power and governmental accountability — and the risks when that balance is disrupted.